Ministry of environmental protection are at most of the system after the introduction of the reform program set up by one of four new Department. That people always thought that China's serious environmental pollution, one of the reasons why the right is a small department responsible for environmental protection, and this under the Environmental Protection Agency joined the cabinet to become the Ministry of environmental protection, and other big responsibility right to the ministries on an equal footing, people naturally look forward to then Ministry of environmental protection to come up with some big "gesture" here. Ministry of environmental protection do not seem to want to let people look in vain, at the recently held 2008 national work conference on environmental enforcement, Zhou Shengxian, Minister of position, said: "The strong reaction among the masses, and listed the case of supervision, it is necessary to investigate and deal in place, the rectification and reform in place, investigate and deal with a to deter the party, affecting one. This year's environmental law enforcement to pursue some weight, the impact of the country's major and important cases. "

However, the Ministry of environmental protection "three fire" are not my favorite. This is not doubt the determination of the Department of environmental protection, but because the Ministry of environmental protection should be investigated and dealt with the object of too strong - they are by a handful of local governments or department with some living in monopoly enterprises to pursue their own interests for the needs of forged Alliance, which is the so-called special interest groups in the field of environment. Special interest groups resulted in the continued deterioration of the environment, which has long been at the academic environmental protection is not a secret. Former deputy director of the State Environmental Protection Administration, is Pan Yue, deputy minister of environmental protection has criticized some local governments under the protection of enterprises with extreme rude manner put people's resources and environment in the realization of personal interests.

In China, such local governments and enterprises has a long history of collusion profit. China recently published the Green Paper on the Environment pointed out that the transition to a market economy more than a decade, local governments and businesses close or even exceed the original "政企合一" planned economy period, the emergence of the "political and economic integration of "trend. This alliance benefits situation particularly in electricity, chemicals, coal, paper and other industries. Can assert that the reason why some local governments and officials want to build big high-energy consuming and highly polluting projects, not simply for "political achievements", behind the benefits have naked grab. Enterprises are "capital hostage environmental governance", if the local government to trace the responsibility of environmental protection enterprises, investors tend to withdraw to resist or coerce, local government enterprises because of worry about the relocation will cause the loss of sources of tax revenue, unemployment and social assistance and other issues, but also on the bow to the will of capital under the pollution of the environment for enterprise open eyes closed eyes, let matters drift.

There are two things that can witness the special interest groups in the field of the environment of large forces. First, the evaluation of green GDP stranded, are planning two EIAO legislative resistance. Originally, both to solve China's environmental crisis means very good. However, because the former from the traditional GDP by deducting the cost of natural resource depletion and environmental degradation costs, so that the fruits of development in some provinces and municipalities may have a negative, so the place was a lot of opposition, leading to the evaluation of fruitless ; latter aspect from planning to stand in the way of a number of high-pollution projects started, which also makes a few of the Ordinance has set out, that is, not get out.

Why in the field of environment will be entrenched special interest groups? I think that with our over-emphasis on the development of Marxism. Look from the academic field of environment, special interest groups "ideological weapon" is the development of Marxism. The development of Marxism as a doctrine, has its own value, but if put into a development of Marxist ideology to guide development, it may be seriously flawed. Since in the development discourse and the institutional and under, a certain natural objects, once with the "resources" the value of these natural objects were quickly on the merchandise at the process of marketization, through a variety of local or global capital and technology dependent relations, more and more concentrated in a variety of powerful and influential groups and the Capital Group's hands, be used to meet their required benefits, and allow most people to take resource depletion and environmental damage of the disastrous consequences. The development of Marxism in China after the reform and opening up especially popular because it is that it allows the name of the people and get-rich-quick development of the National Express banner.

Therefore, it is necessary to remove the field of environment the power of special interest groups, first of all should be the guiding ideology, breaking the myth of the development of doctrine. In addition, it is necessary to state-owned natural resources such as land property rights system reform. Because special interest groups on water, land and mineral resources, such as wanton encroachment not add Value, to a large extent with those resources related to incomplete property rights. Furthermore, we should also conduct an extensive public mobilization, so that the cause of environmental protection into the public, which is of special interest groups to prevent damage to the environment is also essential. Practice has proved that as long as the public involvement, we see the power of rent-seeking can not break through the obstacles.

As for the Ministry of environmental protection "three fire" can spread to what extent, I think too unpredictable. In fact, the familiar road to power and capital of the special interest groups, if the economic development of the existing methods and examination system is not changed, do not say "three fire" means "ten fire", but also could not burn their eyebrows . But, of course, also not to our disappointment, there is "fire" than never "fire", and it at least shows that the Ministry of environmental protection, or want to make a difference.